Home> Tablets by Brandon Chester on October 15, 2015 800 AM EST Posted in Tablets Mobile Battery Life Modern tablets typically haven't struggled to last users through the day. Even the original iPad was rated for ten hours of usage, and most tablets from various vendors tend to hit or exceed this target in workloads like web browsing and watching video. However, as manufacturers have tried to slim down their tablets and reduce their mass, they have had to decrease the sizes of the batteries they include. While this can be offset by reductions in overall platform power, if it isn't offset the tablet can struggle to last throughout the day even when performing relatively lightweight tasks. When the Tab S2 was originally announced I saw concerns regarding the battery capacity of both models. The original Tab S tablets were already very thin, and with both Tab S2 tablets again being the thinnest in their class Samsung has had to reduce the battery capacity of each model. What's also concerning is that the original Tab S tablets had some battery life issues of their own. However, there's really no way to gauge battery life just by looking at a device's battery capacity, and so we turn to our standard suite of battery tests which includes a WiFi web browsing rundown, a video playback test, BaseMark OS II's battery test, PCMark's battery test, and GFXBench 3's battery test. Our web browsing battery life test is mostly display bound, and the Tab S2 does not fare well during it. At hours, it's our second lowest result, beating only the Dell Venue 10 7040 which I noted for having exceptionally poor web browsing battery life. It's almost a given that this result is due to the power required by the display, as the high level of white on a common web page will increase AMOLED power consumption dramatically. The results of this test make me question some of the design decisions made during the creation of the Tab S2. Clearly this sort of problem would have shown up during testing, and the Tab S2's platform power is obviously higher than the internal battery can support for an acceptable length of time. Like its predecessors, the Tab S2 does very well in our video playback battery test. Since the power usage of decoding video is essentially a fixed amount this result is also dependant on display power. In the case of AMOLED devices, the ability to turn off black pixels is a huge advantage and results in the category leading scores that you see above. The smaller battery of the Tab S2 is likely what leads to it trailing the original Tab S tablets by a couple of hours, and while the Tab S2 definitely won't be as good as its predecessors for watching films due to its aspect ratio, it still lasts more than long enough for anyone to sit on a plane or train and watch several films or a season of a TV show. At first glance, the Tab S2 appears to do well in BaseMark OS II's battery test. Its run time is above the median, which should be a good thing. Unfortunately, this test really has two parts to it. Because the BaseMark battery test runs a CPU load over time one has to consider how performant a device was during the duration of the test. In the case of the Tab S2, I saw some of the lowest levels of CPU usage that I've ever seen on a mobile device. The impact of this can be seen in BaseMark's battery score for the Tab S2, which is the lowest device on record. In that sense, the result of BaseMark OS II is actually not favorable for the Tab S2, as it only achieved its run time due to low CPU usage during the test period. Based on the results so far I wasn't hopeful for a great battery runtime in PCMark's battery test. I was actually quite surprised when the test finished and I saw the Tab S2 with a score far greater than any other tablet. I believe this is because of the relatively long CPU idle periods and lower average display APL than our web browsing test or BaseMark OS II's battery test. What this says is that the Tab S2 is capable of good battery life in a very mixed and balanced workload, but if you're performing any display or CPU heavy tasks for any significant period of time you're going to experience the high levels of battery drain demonstrated in the earlier tests. In GFXBench's battery benchmark test the Galaxy Tab S2 lasts for a very long period of time. However, this test really has two sides to it. While a device can last a long time, if it maintains a completely unplayable frame rate for the duration of the test then it's not really providing a better experience than a device that lasts half as long but runs at a very high frame rate which would actually be playable if the user was experiencing this type of workload while playing a game. In this case, the Tab S2 is never even able to reach a frame rate of 30fps, and after around 25 minutes performance has dropped to 17fps. In contrast, the iPad Air 2 dies an hour before the Tab S2 does, but achieves a frame rate of around 50fps and maintains it for the entire time period. The Nexus 9 only lasts two and a half hours, but also achieves a very high frame rate during the benchmark. These results are a good example of how the gap between the GPU performance of the Tab S2 and the iPad Air 2 and Nexus 9 is actually much larger in the real world than single run GPU benchmarks show. I think the Galaxy Tab S2 is definitely a case where a thin chassis was prioritized to the point where battery life suffered, and I don't believe that it was the right call. While the Tab S2 handily beats every other full sized tablet on thickness and mass, the battery life falls short in several situations. Web browsing battery life is not even close to where it should be, and BaseMark OS II shows that in a sustained CPU heavy workload the Tab S2 has to maintain a very low level of CPU performance to achieve the run time that it does. PCMark shows than in a heavily mixed workload there is the possibility of good battery life, but in my own experience which tends more toward web browsing, news reading, and working in Microsoft Office I've experienced battery life much closer to the results of BaseMark OS II and our web browsing test than PCMark's battery test. Charge Time Since tablets have significantly larger batteries than most smartphones they have been shipping with high wattage chargers since before fast charging came to smartphones. Unfortunately, the Tab S2 is an exception to this trend, and doesn't have any support for fast charging. I actually wasn't even sent the standard Samsung charging block along with the tablet, and since there's no fast charging support I just charged it with my 18W charger to ensure the block was more than capable of supplying 5W to the tablet. The Tab S2 takes hours to charge, and considering its small battery capacity and the battery life sacrifices made because of it I think this was a big mistake on Samsung's part. If you're doing any CPU intensive tasks or doing a lot of web browsing it's very possible that it could take as long to recharge the Tab S2 as it lasted on battery. Suffice to say, both the battery life and the charging time on the Tab S2 are less than stellar. Camera and WiFi Software

VotreGalaxy Tab S2 9.7 a un problème de batterie Vous n'avez plus de son sur votre Galaxy Tab S2 9.7; Votre Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 ne charge plus; Pas de son en appel sur votre Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 Votre tablette Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 a pris l'eau Les photos de votre Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 sont floues La vitre arrière de votre Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 est cassée

changer batterie tablette samsung galaxy tab s2